Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ® °æºÎ°ñ ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ Á¤·®Àû ºÐ¼®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

±è¿ì½Ä, À̱Ժ¹, Á¶±¤Çå,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¿ì½Ä ( Kim Woo-Sik ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³
À̱Ժ¹ ( Lee Kyu-Bok ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¶±¤Çå ( Jo Kwang-Hun ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

°æºÎ°ñ ÃÖ´ëÀÀ·ÂÀ» ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î »êÃâÇϱâ À§Çؼ­, °æºÎ µðÀÚÀÎ Çü»óÀÌ ºñ±³Àû ´Ü¼øÇÑ ¸Þ°¡Á¨ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¸ðµ¨À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î, À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò ¸ðµ¨¸µÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© °æºÎ°ñÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¸¦ °è»êÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í »êÃâµÈ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¸¦ ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®¹ýÀ¸·Î Åë°è ó¸®ÇÏ¿© ÀÀ·Â ÁýÁßÁ¡ÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂÀ» Á¤·®È­ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á°ú´Â ¸ðµç ¸ðµ¨¿¡¼­ °æºÎ°ñ ÀÀ·ÂÀº Ä¡¹Ð°ñ ¿Ü¸é¿¡ ÁýÁߵǾúÀ¸¸ç, ±× ¹üÀ§´Â 0.5mm À̳»¿´´Ù. ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®¹ýÀ» È°¿ëÇϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â mesh Á¤¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ô¾Æ¾ß ÇßÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ °æ¿ì ƯÀÌÁ¡ÀÇ ÃÖ´ë ÀÀ·ÂÀ» ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î »êÃâ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

In this study, the regression analysis method was tested for the estimation of peak stress at stress concentration area in the cervical bone. Submerge type EZ plus implant (Megagen. Daegu, Korea), 4.1 mm in cervical diameter and 9.6 mm in endosseous length, were axisymmetrically modelled together with surrounding alveolar bone of which the width was 10 mm. Vertical force of 100 N was applied to a head of crown above 8.5 mm from the outer surface of the cortical bone. Four different mesh models were composed of differently sized elements in vicinity of sharp corners, and they include 6 stress monitoring points that are located in the same geometrical points regardless of the differences in the meshes. Primary consideration was given to the stresses in the cortical bone surrounding the implant neck. The results showed that virtually all the stresses were concentrated in the cortical bone regardless of mesh designs. The peak stresses were successfully calculated by a regression analysis in a stable manner, as far as the mesh is designed to represent the acute gradient of stresses near the sharp corner.

Å°¿öµå

À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®;ÀÓÇöõÆ® °æºÎ°ñ ÀÀ·Â;ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®
finite element analysis;implant crestal bone stresses;regressi

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI